12月9日雅思大作文示范寫(xiě)作|組織領(lǐng)袖是否有年齡魔咒

November 11, 2023雅思作文真題直擊 | | 欄目推送說(shuō)明每場(chǎng)雅思考試之后，第一時(shí)間分享本場(chǎng)考試雅思A類大作文的范文權(quán)威解析。歡迎每周鎖定。本期作者：王瑜2023年12月9日雅思大作文題目The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree?組織的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)或主管通常是老年人。但是有些人說(shuō)年輕人也可以成為領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?文章結(jié)構(gòu)分析：第一段：開(kāi)啟背景第二段：分析年輕人在組織領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力上的優(yōu)勢(shì)第三段：分析年輕人較于老年人在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力上的弱勢(shì)第四段：表明立場(chǎng)范文及解析IntroductionWhileseniorityhas long beenextolled asa virtue for organizationalleadership,skepticsmay argue that younger leaders areequallydeserving of consideration.解析解析：雖然資歷長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)一直被譽(yù)為組織領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的一種優(yōu)點(diǎn)，但持懷疑態(tài)度的人可能會(huì)認(rèn)為，年輕的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者同樣值得考慮。? seniority 資歷n.? be extolled as 被譽(yù)為? leadership 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 n.? skeptics 懷疑論者? equally 同樣 adv.Body 1Youth creativity is a major source ofskepticism, and itraises a fundamental questionabout how an organization should be run. Rather than beingperpetually vulnerabletocunning biases or prejudices, younger generation are more likely tothrow authority out of the doorandeliminate hierarchy, thusearning trustthat allows their leadership to riseorganically. More importantly, positive changes and evennew pathswould crystalize. TheForum of Young Global Leaders, for instance, has established a five-year program foryoung elitesin the fields of business, fashion design, and refugee base to test their most innovative solutions—which their morecautiousolder counterparts might be willing to overlook.解析年輕人的創(chuàng)造力是懷疑的主要來(lái)源，它提出了一個(gè)關(guān)于組織應(yīng)該如何運(yùn)作的根本問(wèn)題。年輕一代不會(huì)永遠(yuǎn)受到狡猾的偏見(jiàn)的影響，他們更有可能將權(quán)威排除在外，消除等級(jí)制度，從而贏得信任，從而使他們的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力有機(jī)地上升。更重要的是，積極的變化，甚至新的道路將會(huì)具體化。例如，全球青年領(lǐng)袖論壇(Forum of Young Global Leaders)為商業(yè)、時(shí)裝設(shè)計(jì)和難民基地領(lǐng)域的年輕精英設(shè)立了一個(gè)為期五年的項(xiàng)目，以測(cè)試他們最具創(chuàng)新性的解決方案，而這些解決方案可能是他們更為謹(jǐn)慎的年長(zhǎng)同行們?cè)敢夂鲆暤摹? skepticism 懷疑 n.? raises a fundamental question 提出根本問(wèn)題? perpetually vulnerable 永遠(yuǎn)受到影響? cunning 狡猾的? biases or prejudices 偏見(jiàn)? throw authority out of the door 將權(quán)威排除在外? eliminate hierarchy 消除等級(jí)制度? earn trust 贏得信任? organically 有機(jī)地? new paths 新的道路? crystalize 具體化顯現(xiàn) v.? Forum of Young Global Leaders 全球青年領(lǐng)袖論壇? young elites 年輕精英? cautious 謹(jǐn)慎的Body 2Though seemingly arosyprospect,hailingthe young in anindiscriminatemanner couldbackfire. Having a relatively shorttenureand inadequatelife wisdom, some young leaders mayexhibit a propensityformockingolder generations’ideas and ideals, rather thanbeing tunedin to senior employees’goals and aspirations. Theupshotof this could be diminishingmorale, further hindering the leader fromexercisinghis or herinfluence. Another potential riskpertainsto pragmaticism. When handling internal or external disputes,technocratswith years of experience inmultidisciplinary fields, for instance, typically provideevidence-based solutions. However, we could reasonablyassumethat thistime-honoredmerit is too distant for the younger generations.解析雖然前景看起來(lái)很美好，但不加區(qū)分地為年輕人歡呼可能會(huì)適得其反。由于任期相對(duì)較短，生活智慧不足，一些年輕的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者可能會(huì)表現(xiàn)出嘲笑老一輩人的想法和理想的傾向，而不是關(guān)注資深員工的目標(biāo)和愿望。這樣做的結(jié)果可能會(huì)降低士氣，進(jìn)一步阻礙領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者發(fā)揮他或她的影響力。另一個(gè)潛在的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與實(shí)用主義有關(guān)。例如，在處理內(nèi)部或外部爭(zhēng)端時(shí)，在多學(xué)科領(lǐng)域具有多年經(jīng)驗(yàn)的技術(shù)官僚通常會(huì)提供基于證據(jù)的解決方案。然而，我們可以合理地認(rèn)為，這種時(shí)間沉淀而來(lái)的優(yōu)點(diǎn)對(duì)年輕一代來(lái)說(shuō)不太可能獲得。? rosy 美好的? hail 贊美? indiscriminate 不加區(qū)分的? backfire 適得其反? tenure任期? life wisdom 生活智慧? exhibit a propensity 展現(xiàn)傾向做某事? mock 嘲笑? ideas and ideals 想法和理想? being tuned in 關(guān)注? goals and aspirations 目標(biāo)和愿望? upshot 結(jié)果? morale 士氣? exercise influence 發(fā)揮影響力? pertains to 與有關(guān)? technocrats 技術(shù)官僚? multidisciplinary fields 多學(xué)科領(lǐng)域? evidence-based solutions 基于證據(jù)的解決方案? assume 認(rèn)為? time-honored 時(shí)間沉淀的ConclusionTo conclude, theconvictionthat first-time managers may not outcompete with elderly counterparts wouldmiss the point. Instead, the highlight should be one’sprerequisiteabilities and desirable new skills that determine whether this youthful management couldcome into play.解析總而言之，認(rèn)為首次擔(dān)任經(jīng)理的人可能不會(huì)勝過(guò)年長(zhǎng)的同行的觀點(diǎn)是錯(cuò)誤的。相反，重點(diǎn)應(yīng)該是一個(gè)人的必備能力和令人滿意的新技能，這決定了這種年輕的管理是否能發(fā)揮作用。? conviction 觀點(diǎn)? miss the point 未能理解事物核心? prerequisite 必備能力? come into play 發(fā)揮作用wangqituijian